> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. K. Khury [SMTP:email@example.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 1999 12:27 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Cc: John.Purple@po.state.ct.us; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: CAS Election Process
> You want discussion.... and that is what you will get.
> I read your notes with intetest. I understand all of your observations
> and what you would like to see happen with putting up most of the
> positions of responsibility for election.
> So, to kick off the discussion, I temporarily will assume your position
> that everyone who is elected is really not elected but
> appointed/annointed, and would like to ask you, what is it that is broken
> that you would like to see fixed? Is the condition we assume, that some
> people are appointed/annointed, a prpoblem by itself? Are the
> appointed/annointed people
> doing a bad job when a better job could be done by elected people? Are
> some deserving people getting overlooked by this appointment/annointment
> process? Or is it something else. I think it would help this discussion
> if you would identify the problems (or the consequences of the problems)
> you see with the current set up.....
> PS. While we are at it, would you want the executive director position up
> for election? And if not, why not?
> Visit the CAS Web Site at http://www.casact.org
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from CASNET:
> Send an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
> Type in the body join casnet to subscribe
> or leave casnet to unsubscribe.
Visit the CAS Web Site at http://www.casact.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe from CASNET:
Send an e-mail to email@example.com
Type in the body join casnet to subscribe
or leave casnet to unsubscribe.