The California Table L [Author's Response]

Abstract
The two reviews suggest alternative approaches to three problems, the incompatibility of California Tables L and M for certain entry values, the multitude of Table L’s required for countrywide use, and the difficulty of measuring the incremental charge. Mr. Snader suggests a pragmatic method of graduation to produce a consistent set of tables while maintaining the assumption that the loss elimination ratio is independent of premium size. Mr. Harwayne develops a simple method of estimating the incremental charge for Table M.
Volume
LXII
Page
26-33
Year
1975
Categories
Actuarial Applications and Methodologies
Ratemaking
Retrospective Rating
Publications
Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society
Authors
David Skurnick