Abstract
Motivation: Capital allocation can have substantial ramifications upon measuring risk adjusted profitability as well as setting risk loads for pricing. Current allocation methods that emphasize the tail allocate too much capital to extreme events; “capital consumption” methods, which incorporate relative likelihood, tend to allocate insufficient capital to highly unlikely yet extremely severe losses.
Method: In this paper I develop a new formulation of the meaning of holding capital equal to the Value at Risk. The new formulation views the total capital of the firm as the sum of many percentile layers of capital. Thus capital allocation varies continuously by layer and the capital allocated to any particular loss scenario is the sum of allocated capital across many percentile layers.
Results: Capital allocation by percentile layer produces capital allocations that differ significantly from other common methods such as VaR, TVaR, and coTVaR.
Conclusions: Capital allocation by percentile layer has important advantages over existing methods. It highlights a new formulation of Value at Risk and other capital standards, recognizes the capital usage of losses that do not extend into the tail, and captures the disproportionate capital usage of severe losses.
Availability: To discuss further, please contact the author at neil.bodoff@willis.com or neil_bodoff@yahoo.com
Keywords: Capital Allocation; Percentile Layer of Capital; Value at Risk; Enterprise Risk Management; Risk Load; Risk Adjusted Profitability
Method: In this paper I develop a new formulation of the meaning of holding capital equal to the Value at Risk. The new formulation views the total capital of the firm as the sum of many percentile layers of capital. Thus capital allocation varies continuously by layer and the capital allocated to any particular loss scenario is the sum of allocated capital across many percentile layers.
Results: Capital allocation by percentile layer produces capital allocations that differ significantly from other common methods such as VaR, TVaR, and coTVaR.
Conclusions: Capital allocation by percentile layer has important advantages over existing methods. It highlights a new formulation of Value at Risk and other capital standards, recognizes the capital usage of losses that do not extend into the tail, and captures the disproportionate capital usage of severe losses.
Availability: To discuss further, please contact the author at neil.bodoff@willis.com or neil_bodoff@yahoo.com
Keywords: Capital Allocation; Percentile Layer of Capital; Value at Risk; Enterprise Risk Management; Risk Load; Risk Adjusted Profitability
Volume
Winter
Page
196-223
Year
2008
Categories
Actuarial Applications and Methodologies
Capital Management
Capital Allocation
Financial and Statistical Methods
Risk Pricing and Risk Evaluation Models
Traditional Risk Load (Profit Margin);
Financial and Statistical Methods
Risk Measures
Value-at-Risk (VAR);
Actuarial Applications and Methodologies
Enterprise Risk Management
Financial and Statistical Methods
Risk loading
Publications
Casualty Actuarial Society E-Forum
Documents