While accounting principles and actuarial standards of practice are all well designed, they provide only broad guidance to the actuary on what is “reasonable.” This broad guidance is based on the principle that “reasonable” assumptions and methods lead to “reasonable” estimates. Unfortunately, this broad guidance can leave the low end of a range of “reasonable” reserves open to an interpretation that could lead to unintended consequences in practice. This paper reviews some current actuarial practices and examines how they relate to the question of what is “reasonable” from a statistical perspective.Moreover, it reviews and further develops some statistical concepts and principles that actuaries can add to their repertoire when developing ranges and distributions of liability estimates and then evaluating the “reasonableness” of management’s best estimate within those ranges and distributions.
Loss Reserve Estimates: A Statistical Approach for Determining "Reasonableness"
Loss Reserve Estimates: A Statistical Approach for Determining "Reasonableness"
Abstract
Volume
1
Issue
1 Spring
Page
0120-0148
Year
2007
Keywords
Reasonable reserve, reserve variability, reserve range, reserve distribution, best estimate, risk margin, unpaid claim liability, deterministic methods, stochastic model
Categories
Actuarial Applications and Methodologies
Reserving
Management Best Estimate
Actuarial Applications and Methodologies
Reserving
Materiality
Actuarial Applications and Methodologies
Reserving
Reserve Variability
Actuarial Applications and Methodologies
Accounting and Reporting
Statement of Actuarial Opinion (SAO);
Actuarial Applications and Methodologies
Reserving
Suitability Testing
Actuarial Applications and Methodologies
Reserving
Uncertainty and Ranges
Publications
Variance
Audio