Abstract
A series of laboratory studies of insurance decision making shows that people buy more insurance against events having a moderately high probability of inflicting a relatively small loss than against low-proba- bility, high-loss events. Two explanations are discussed, both contrary to traditional utility theory. One postulates a utility function convex over losses. The second asserts that people refuse to protect themselves against losses whose probability is below some threshold. This research provides insight into other, often puzzling, facts about people‘s insur- ance behavior. Relevance for public policy is discussed.
Volume
44
Page
237 ‐ 258
Number
2
Year
1977
Categories
Behavioral Insurance
Publications
Journal of Risk and Insurance