Abstract
The tasks of a supervisory authority (SA) are to guide and inspect municipalities in mitigation, and risk and emergency management. Two municipalities which have shown different responses to the work of SA are compared. Klepp municipality resisted inspections by SA and created its own solution to risk management. Time municipality regarded governmental guidelines as a facilitator to their work and accepted inspections. Despite its negative attitude, Klepp contributed to a mutual learning process between the municipality and the SA by introducing a new strategy and tool (mini risk analysis, MRA) in risk management. MRA is a tool which may lay the foundations for empowerment and involvement in local risk management. It is specially designed for municipal contexts, focussing on daily risks in working processes. Time, on the other hand, passively accepted SA inspections and did not actively contribute to the learning process.
Volume
9
Page
255‐270
Number
4
Year
2007
Keywords
Risk management; supervisory authorities (SA); municipalities; supervision; inspection
Categories
Risk Control
Publications
Risk Management