Abstract
People in insurance work all the time with financial processes that are best modeled with skewed distributions. Despite our constant exposure to skewed distributions, I believe when we study sample averages from these skewed distributions we think and work with them as if they were samples from normal symmetrical distributions. In this paper I want to discuss the idea that a sample average is biased lower than the actual mean of a skewed distribution – an amount that depends on the sample size and how skewed the distribution is. I will talk about the implications that this small sample bias has for credibility procedures. Why do people ignore outliers? I will offer up some possible reason for why we ignore outliers and why deals get done despite what the data indicates. I will talk about the winner's curse or why we lose even as we win. Finally, I will offer a small sample of skewed random thoughts on why these ideas explain everything from people engaging in risky behaviors to the property/casualty insurance cycle.
Volume
Spring 2007
Page
1-28
Year
2007
Categories
Financial and Statistical Methods
Statistical Models and Methods
Sampling
Publications
CAS 2007 Spring Forum
Documents